Paul Vriens wrote:
Hi,
Test crashes on win98.
Changelog Don't crash on win98
Cheers,
Paul.
As I recall some programs do this and it works. And those programs strictly require w2k+ to work. Should we use a version check here instead?
Vitaliy.
Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
Paul Vriens wrote:
Hi,
Test crashes on win98.
Changelog Don't crash on win98
Cheers,
Paul.
As I recall some programs do this and it works. And those programs strictly require w2k+ to work. Should we use a version check here instead?
Vitaliy.
Well I was going through some old emails and saw I promised (after a 'discussion' with Alexandre) to come up with a patch to skip this test.
I only just now read the whole chain and saw that he said not to worry that much about win98 failures. What I will do instead is move the failing test after the check for the W-call, that should solve this particular issue.
Cheers,
Paul.
Paul Vriens wrote:
Vitaliy Margolen wrote:
Paul Vriens wrote:
Hi,
Test crashes on win98.
Changelog Don't crash on win98
Cheers,
Paul.
As I recall some programs do this and it works. And those programs strictly require w2k+ to work. Should we use a version check here instead?
Vitaliy.
Well I was going through some old emails and saw I promised (after a 'discussion' with Alexandre) to come up with a patch to skip this test.
I only just now read the whole chain and saw that he said not to worry that much about win98 failures. What I will do instead is move the failing test after the check for the W-call, that should solve this particular issue.
Cheers,
Paul.
Talking rubbish I see, as they are not in the same function. Do you think we can do a simple W-call just to see if we are on win98 instead of doing a version check? Or does that defeat the purpose?
Cheers,
Paul.
-
Paul Vriens -
Vitaliy Margolen