"Kai Blin" kai.blin@gmail.com wrote:
- else
- {
WARN("ntlm_auth not found, or in an outdated version.\n" \
"Make sure you are using ntlm_auth =< 3.x and it is in your path.\n");
- }
If the message is supposed to be user visible (otherwise why to bother with wording?) it would be better to use either FIXME or MESSAGE.
Also "=<" is not really understandable in this context. Did you mean that a version 3.x or better is required (then >= 3.x), or <= 3.x (then the word "outdated" is misleading)?
On Sunday 17 September 2006 09:54, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
"Kai Blin" kai.blin@gmail.com wrote:
- else
- {
WARN("ntlm_auth not found, or in an outdated version.\n" \
"Make sure you are using ntlm_auth =< 3.x and it is in your
path.\n"); + }
If the message is supposed to be user visible (otherwise why to bother with wording?) it would be better to use either FIXME or MESSAGE.
I put it in so we would be able to tell in a trace that ntlm_auth wasn't there. I guess we can make that visible to the user.
Also "=<" is not really understandable in this context. Did you mean that a version 3.x or better is required (then >= 3.x), or <= 3.x (then the word "outdated" is misleading)?
Yeah, good catch.. I must have been thinking in reverse polish notation or something. I'll fix that.
Kai