On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Paul Chitescu paulc@voip.null.ro wrote:
Changelog: user32.dll: Stub for LockWorkStation()
Not sure if user_main.c is the right place but I put it together with ExitWindowsEx.
Would you mind taking a shot at implementing this properly? It was on my TODO but I most likely will never get back to it. Here is my patch from before which was wrong.
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-May/039240.html
What we need to do is use SendMessage to talk to the existing explorer.exe process and have it do the locking. Feel free to use what i have to make a patch if your interested.
2008/9/8 Steven Edwards winehacker@gmail.com:
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Paul Chitescu paulc@voip.null.ro wrote:
Changelog: user32.dll: Stub for LockWorkStation()
Not sure if user_main.c is the right place but I put it together with ExitWindowsEx.
Would you mind taking a shot at implementing this properly? It was on my TODO but I most likely will never get back to it. Here is my patch from before which was wrong.
http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-patches/2007-May/039240.html
What we need to do is use SendMessage to talk to the existing explorer.exe process and have it do the locking. Feel free to use what i have to make a patch if your interested.
Having a stub implementation is a good first step towards a full implementation, provided that the stub won't cause security issues or cause more applications to crash, which I don't believe is the case here.
If you have an existing implementation, you can rebase it on top of this patch and submit it to wine-devel/wine-patches.
-
Rob Shearman -
Steven Edwards