Errors in Win API Stats

[Peter Åstrand]

I've noticied that http://www.winehq.org/site/winapi_stats is not quite 
correct. For example, it claims that "amstream" is 100% implemented, which 
is not correct: There are 21 stubs or something like that.

How is this page generated?

Regards,

[Robert Shearman]

Peter Åstrand wrote:
> I've noticied that http://www.winehq.org/site/winapi_stats is not 
> quite correct. For example, it claims that "amstream" is 100% 
> implemented, which is not correct: There are 21 stubs or something 
> like that.
>
> How is this page generated?

It only looks at functions exported in the spec file. It doesn't look at 
COM interfaces.