Hi All, I don't understand the reason we are still manually including each header in most of the sources. Its like totally incompatible with the latest PSDK unless you add a define for _X86_. We are getting to the point in some of the sources where we might as well just include Windows.h becuase we already include all of the files it includes or close enough to them. Can someone explain the reason to me we are still manually messing with a lot of these headers?
Thanks Steven
P.S. I have even read threads online where Microsoft's Visual Studio developers tell the users NOT to manually include WinNT, WinBase, etc.
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 01:30:59AM -0500, Steven Edwards wrote:
Hi All, I don't understand the reason we are still manually including each header in most of the sources. Its like totally incompatible with the latest PSDK unless you add a define for _X86_. We are getting to the point in some of the sources where we might as well just include Windows.h becuase we already include all of the files it includes or close enough to them. Can someone explain the reason to me we are still manually messing with a lot of these headers?
Originally done to reduce remakes when changing one file and to reduce overall compile time and object size.
Ciao, Marcus
-
Marcus Meissner -
Steven Edwards