Re: Fix comctl32 conformance test

[Rolf Kalbermatter]

Alexandre Julliard  wrote:

<Hans Leidekker  writes:
> > It appears that the comctl32 conformance test calls functions by name 
> > that are exported by ordinal only on Windows. Still the test runs (and
> > thus run-time links) on Wine. Is this wanted behavior?
>
> Yes it is, the functions are converted to ordinal imports by the
> import library. The existing code works just fine, except when
> cross-compiling on Mingw because the import libraries are broken
> there. This should be fixed in Mingw not in Wine.

Mmh! I have downloaded the PSDK from the MSDN site, and although it
says Microsoft Platform SDK February 2003 in the Start menu it really
was just downloaded one month ago and my comctl32.lib does not contain
symbols for at least DPA_Create() and DPA_GetPtr() while it does contain
most of the other DPA symbols.

What am I missing here?

Rolf Kalbermatter

Fix comctl32 conformance test

[Gregory M. Turner]

On Tuesday 21 October 2003 08:17 am, Rolf Kalbermatter wrote:
> Mmh! I have downloaded the PSDK from the MSDN site, and although it
> says Microsoft Platform SDK February 2003 in the Start menu it really
> was just downloaded one month ago and my comctl32.lib does not contain
> symbols for at least DPA_Create() and DPA_GetPtr() while it does contain
> most of the other DPA symbols.
>
> What am I missing here?

Nothing.  For some reason, February is the latest PSDK release.

Fix comctl32 conformance test

[Hans Leidekker]

On Tuesday 21 October 2003 15:17, Rolf Kalbermatter wrote:
> Mmh! I have downloaded the PSDK from the MSDN site, and although it
> says Microsoft Platform SDK February 2003 in the Start menu it really
> was just downloaded one month ago and my comctl32.lib does not contain
> symbols for at least DPA_Create() and DPA_GetPtr() while it does contain
> most of the other DPA symbols.
>
> What am I missing here?

Well, in my understanding it is correct that you don't find e.g. DPA_Create
exported because it's exported by ordinal only. Wine knows that too but
MinGW doesn't. DPA_Search isn't marked NONAME (ordinal only) in
their .def file so 'conversion' as Alexandre called it isn't done. Hence
my problems running this test.

-Hans