Please create 1.2.0 milestone in Bugzilla

[Dan Kegel]

The 1.1.x releases will be development releases,
so a 1.1.0 milestone doesn't make much sense.
Please create a 1.2.0 milestone in Bugzilla.
Thanks!
- Dan

[Edward Savage]

On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Dan Kegel  wrote:
> The 1.1.x releases will be development releases,
>  so a 1.1.0 milestone doesn't make much sense.
>  Please create a 1.2.0 milestone in Bugzilla.
>  Thanks!
> - Dan

Is there a reason we wont be continuing the current y.y.x (ie 0.9.x
and 1.0.x) style releases for development?

Most foss applications seem to have moved away from the even odd
release cycle and due to wines long lead times between releases having
it this way could get rather confusing for newer users not expecting
it.

Edward

Ps Sorry for the dupe dan, hit the wrong button.

[Ben Hodgetts]

Edward Savage wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:15 AM, Dan Kegel  wrote:
> > The 1.1.x releases will be development releases,
> >  so a 1.1.0 milestone doesn't make much sense.
> >  Please create a 1.2.0 milestone in Bugzilla.
> >  Thanks!
> > - Dan
>
> Is there a reason we wont be continuing the current y.y.x (ie 0.9.x
> and 1.0.x) style releases for development?
>
> Most foss applications seem to have moved away from the even odd
> release cycle and due to wines long lead times between releases having
> it this way could get rather confusing for newer users not expecting
> it.
>
> Edward
>
> Ps Sorry for the dupe dan, hit the wrong button.

As far as I'm aware, 1.2.0 will be a long time off (as would 1.1.0) it's 
just the next _big_ milestone. He doesn't mean that after 1.0.0 there 
wont be anything before 1.1.0. It's just a point to aim to fix the main 
bugs by.

Ben H.

[Dan Kegel]

On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 3:30 AM, Edward Savage  wrote:
> Is there a reason we wont be continuing the current y.y.x (ie 0.9.x
>  and 1.0.x) style releases for development?

We will, actually.  What made you think we wouldn't?
Is http://wiki.winehq.org/WineReleasePlan poorly written?

1.1.x will be our trunk during the 1.1 era.
We may or may not have development on the 1.0 branch;
depends on if there's demand and volunteer manpower.
- Dan

[Austin English]

On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Dan Kegel  wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 3:30 AM, Edward Savage  wrote:
> > Is there a reason we wont be continuing the current y.y.x (ie 0.9.x
> >  and 1.0.x) style releases for development?
>
> We will, actually.  What made you think we wouldn't?
>  Is http://wiki.winehq.org/WineReleasePlan poorly written?
>
> 1.1.x will be our trunk during the 1.1 era.
>  We may or may not have development on the 1.0 branch;
>  depends on if there's demand and volunteer manpower.
> - Dan

If 1.1.0 is set to be released two weeks after 1.0, then we may need
to adjust the target milestones in bugzilla for some of them. I doubt,
for instance, that a DIB engine will be implemented in a that time.

-Austin

(Sorry for the dupe Dan, hit the wrong button).