On 05.07.2017 21:23, André Hentschel wrote:
- p_vcomp_fork(TRUE, 5, fork_uintptr_cb, (UINT_PTR)1, (UINT_PTR)(MAXUINT_PTR - 2),
(UINT_PTR)3, (UINT_PTR)(MAXUINT_PTR - 4), (UINT_PTR)5);
- p_vcomp_fork(TRUE, 12, fork_uintptr_cb, (UINT_PTR)1, (UINT_PTR)(MAXUINT_PTR - 2),
(UINT_PTR)3, (UINT_PTR)(MAXUINT_PTR - 4), (UINT_PTR)5,
(UINT_PTR)6, (UINT_PTR)7, (UINT_PTR)8, (UINT_PTR)9,
(UINT_PTR)10, (UINT_PTR)11);
Shouldn't the second argument be 11?
Am 05.07.2017 um 21:35 schrieb Sebastian Lackner:
On 05.07.2017 21:23, André Hentschel wrote:
- p_vcomp_fork(TRUE, 5, fork_uintptr_cb, (UINT_PTR)1, (UINT_PTR)(MAXUINT_PTR - 2),
(UINT_PTR)3, (UINT_PTR)(MAXUINT_PTR - 4), (UINT_PTR)5);
- p_vcomp_fork(TRUE, 12, fork_uintptr_cb, (UINT_PTR)1, (UINT_PTR)(MAXUINT_PTR - 2),
(UINT_PTR)3, (UINT_PTR)(MAXUINT_PTR - 4), (UINT_PTR)5,
(UINT_PTR)6, (UINT_PTR)7, (UINT_PTR)8, (UINT_PTR)9,
(UINT_PTR)10, (UINT_PTR)11);
Shouldn't the second argument be 11?
good catch, I'll send an update