On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Matteo Bruni [email protected] wrote:
Ciao, Matteo.
dlls/d3d9/tests/visual.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/d3d9/tests/visual.c b/dlls/d3d9/tests/visual.c index d1aa3d4..acc3a44 100644 --- a/dlls/d3d9/tests/visual.c +++ b/dlls/d3d9/tests/visual.c @@ -6775,8 +6775,6 @@ static void pretransformed_varying_test(void) hr = IDirect3DDevice9_SetVertexDeclaration(device, decl); ok(hr == D3D_OK, "IDirect3DDevice9_SetVertexDeclaration returned %08x\n", hr);
- hr = IDirect3DDevice9_SetVertexDeclaration(device, decl);
- ok(hr == D3D_OK, "IDirect3DDevice9_SetVertexDeclaration returned %08x\n", hr);
Isn't this done on purpose to check if double setting works?
Distinti Saluti, Bruno
2015-01-05 17:37 GMT+01:00 Bruno Jesus [email protected]:
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Matteo Bruni [email protected] wrote:
Ciao, Matteo.
dlls/d3d9/tests/visual.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/d3d9/tests/visual.c b/dlls/d3d9/tests/visual.c index d1aa3d4..acc3a44 100644 --- a/dlls/d3d9/tests/visual.c +++ b/dlls/d3d9/tests/visual.c @@ -6775,8 +6775,6 @@ static void pretransformed_varying_test(void) hr = IDirect3DDevice9_SetVertexDeclaration(device, decl); ok(hr == D3D_OK, "IDirect3DDevice9_SetVertexDeclaration returned %08x\n", hr);
- hr = IDirect3DDevice9_SetVertexDeclaration(device, decl);
- ok(hr == D3D_OK, "IDirect3DDevice9_SetVertexDeclaration returned %08x\n", hr);
Isn't this done on purpose to check if double setting works?
The idea might have been that but I don't think this is interesting to test. Actually it looks more like the side effect of multiple separate changes done over the course of the years over that piece of code.
Distinti Saluti, Bruno
Cheers ;)