[PATCH] gdi32/tests: Fix the spelling of an ok() message.

[Francois Gouget]

Signed-off-by: Francois Gouget 
---
 dlls/gdi32/tests/font.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/dlls/gdi32/tests/font.c b/dlls/gdi32/tests/font.c
index d3ec971dce0..94910ff60fc 100644
--- a/dlls/gdi32/tests/font.c
+++ b/dlls/gdi32/tests/font.c
@@ -5862,7 +5862,7 @@ static void test_GetGlyphOutline_character(void)
     ok(ret != GDI_ERROR, "GetGlyphOutlineW failed for glyph index 0x3\n");

ret = GetGlyphOutlineW(hdc, 0xFFFF, GGO_METRICS|GGO_GLYPH_INDEX, &gm2, 0, NULL, &mat);
-    ok(ret == GDI_ERROR, "GetGlyphOutlineW for nonexistent glyph index 0xFFFF has succeded\n");
+    ok(ret == GDI_ERROR, "GetGlyphOutlineW for nonexistent glyph index 0xFFFF has succeeded\n");

ret = GetGlyphOutlineW(hdc, 0x10003, GGO_METRICS|GGO_GLYPH_INDEX, &gm2, 0, NULL, &mat);
     ok(ret != GDI_ERROR, "GetGlyphOutlineW for index 0x10003 has failed\n");

[Marvin]

Hi,

While running your changed tests, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?

Full results can be found at:
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=82450

Your paranoid android.

=== w10pro64_ar (64 bit report) ===

gdi32:
font.c:1029: Test failed: Small Fonts(12): tm.tmFirstChar = 00
font.c:1035: Test failed: Small Fonts(12): tm.tmBreakChar = 00
font.c:1029: Test failed: Small Fonts(13): tm.tmFirstChar = 00
font.c:1035: Test failed: Small Fonts(13): tm.tmBreakChar = 00