Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjo martin@martin.st --- Changed syntax for sizeof, using ARRAY_SIZE as suggested. --- dlls/ucrtbase/tests/printf.c | 93 +++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/ucrtbase/tests/printf.c b/dlls/ucrtbase/tests/printf.c index 3b48e08b10..7647ac57e2 100644 --- a/dlls/ucrtbase/tests/printf.c +++ b/dlls/ucrtbase/tests/printf.c @@ -90,52 +90,55 @@ static int WINAPIV vsprintf_wrapper(unsigned __int64 options, char *str,
static void test_snprintf (void) { - const char *tests[] = {"short", "justfit", "justfits", "muchlonger"}; + const char *tests[] = {"short", "justfit", "justfits", "muchlonger", "", "1"}; char buffer[8]; - const int bufsiz = sizeof buffer; - unsigned int i; - - /* Legacy _snprintf style termination */ - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++) { - const char *fmt = tests[i]; - const int expect = strlen(fmt) > bufsiz ? -1 : strlen(fmt); - const int n = vsprintf_wrapper (_CRT_INTERNAL_PRINTF_LEGACY_VSPRINTF_NULL_TERMINATION, buffer, bufsiz, fmt); - const int valid = n < 0 ? bufsiz : (n == bufsiz ? n : n+1); - - ok (n == expect, ""%s": expected %d, returned %d\n", - fmt, expect, n); - ok (!memcmp (fmt, buffer, valid), - ""%s": rendered "%.*s"\n", fmt, valid, buffer); - } - - /* C99 snprintf style termination */ - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++) { - const char *fmt = tests[i]; - const int expect = strlen(fmt); - const int n = vsprintf_wrapper (_CRT_INTERNAL_PRINTF_STANDARD_SNPRINTF_BEHAVIOR, buffer, bufsiz, fmt); - const int valid = n >= bufsiz ? bufsiz - 1 : n < 0 ? 0 : n; - - ok (n == expect, ""%s": expected %d, returned %d\n", - fmt, expect, n); - ok (!memcmp (fmt, buffer, valid), - ""%s": rendered "%.*s"\n", fmt, valid, buffer); - ok (buffer[valid] == '\0', - ""%s": Missing null termination (ret %d) - is %d\n", fmt, n, buffer[valid]); - } - - /* swprintf style termination */ - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++) { - const char *fmt = tests[i]; - const int expect = strlen(fmt) >= bufsiz ? -2 : strlen(fmt); - const int n = vsprintf_wrapper (0, buffer, bufsiz, fmt); - const int valid = n < 0 ? bufsiz - 1 : n; - - ok (n == expect, ""%s": expected %d, returned %d\n", - fmt, expect, n); - ok (!memcmp (fmt, buffer, valid), - ""%s": rendered "%.*s"\n", fmt, valid, buffer); - ok (buffer[valid] == '\0', - ""%s": Missing null termination (ret %d) - is %d\n", fmt, n, buffer[valid]); + int bufsizes[] = { 0, 1, sizeof(buffer) }; + unsigned int i, j; + + for (j = 0; j < ARRAY_SIZE(bufsizes); j++) { + const int bufsiz = bufsizes[j]; + /* Legacy _snprintf style termination */ + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++) { + const char *fmt = tests[i]; + const int expect = strlen(fmt) > bufsiz ? -1 : strlen(fmt); + const int n = vsprintf_wrapper (_CRT_INTERNAL_PRINTF_LEGACY_VSPRINTF_NULL_TERMINATION, buffer, bufsiz, fmt); + const int valid = n < 0 ? bufsiz : (n == bufsiz ? n : n+1); + + ok (n == expect, ""%s": expected %d, returned %d\n", + fmt, expect, n); + ok (!memcmp (fmt, buffer, valid), + ""%s": rendered "%.*s"\n", fmt, valid, buffer); + } + + /* C99 snprintf style termination */ + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++) { + const char *fmt = tests[i]; + const int expect = strlen(fmt); + const int n = vsprintf_wrapper (_CRT_INTERNAL_PRINTF_STANDARD_SNPRINTF_BEHAVIOR, buffer, bufsiz, fmt); + const int valid = n >= bufsiz ? (bufsiz > 0 ? bufsiz - 1 : 0) : n < 0 ? 0 : n; + + ok (n == expect, ""%s": expected %d, returned %d\n", + fmt, expect, n); + ok (!memcmp (fmt, buffer, valid), + ""%s": rendered "%.*s" bufsiz %d\n", fmt, valid, buffer, bufsiz); + ok (bufsiz == 0 || buffer[valid] == '\0', + ""%s": Missing null termination (ret %d) - is %d (bufsiz %d)\n", fmt, n, buffer[valid], bufsiz); + } + + /* swprintf style termination */ + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++) { + const char *fmt = tests[i]; + const int expect = strlen(fmt) >= bufsiz ? bufsiz > 0 ? -2 : -1 : strlen(fmt); + const int n = vsprintf_wrapper (0, buffer, bufsiz, fmt); + const int valid = n < 0 ? bufsiz > 0 ? bufsiz - 1 : 0 : n; + + ok (n == expect, ""%s": expected %d, returned %d\n", + fmt, expect, n); + ok (!memcmp (fmt, buffer, valid), + ""%s": rendered "%.*s" bufsiz %d\n", fmt, valid, buffer, bufsiz); + ok (bufsiz == 0 || buffer[valid] == '\0', + ""%s": Missing null termination (ret %d) - is %d\n", fmt, n, buffer[valid]); + } }
ok (vsprintf_wrapper (_CRT_INTERNAL_PRINTF_STANDARD_SNPRINTF_BEHAVIOR, NULL, 0, "abcd") == 4,
Hi,
While running your changed tests, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=71986
Your paranoid android.
=== debiant (32 bit report) ===
ucrtbase: printf.c:135: Test failed: "short": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "justfit": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "justfits": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "muchlonger": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "1": expected -1, returned -2
=== debiant (32 bit French report) ===
ucrtbase: printf.c:135: Test failed: "short": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "justfit": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "justfits": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "muchlonger": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "1": expected -1, returned -2
=== debiant (32 bit Japanese:Japan report) ===
ucrtbase: printf.c:135: Test failed: "short": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "justfit": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "justfits": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "muchlonger": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "1": expected -1, returned -2
=== debiant (32 bit Chinese:China report) ===
ucrtbase: printf.c:135: Test failed: "short": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "justfit": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "justfits": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "muchlonger": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "1": expected -1, returned -2
=== debiant (32 bit WoW report) ===
ucrtbase: printf.c:135: Test failed: "short": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "justfit": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "justfits": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "muchlonger": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "1": expected -1, returned -2
=== debiant (64 bit WoW report) ===
ucrtbase: printf.c:135: Test failed: "short": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "justfit": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "justfits": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "muchlonger": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "1": expected -1, returned -2
On Tue, 19 May 2020, Marvin wrote:
Hi,
While running your changed tests, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=71986
Your paranoid android.
=== debiant (32 bit report) ===
ucrtbase: printf.c:135: Test failed: "short": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "justfit": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "justfits": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "muchlonger": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "": expected -1, returned -2 printf.c:135: Test failed: "1": expected -1, returned -2
I can't reproduce this; the test relies on the ucrtbase printf patch that was pushed just before posting this patch.
// Martin