On 24.10.2015 2:25, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
The u"string" format is easier to write, read, and maintain than the {'s','t','r','i','n','g'} format.
Wasn't this added with C++11?
On Sun, 25 Oct 2015, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
The u"string" format is easier to write, read, and maintain than the {'s','t','r','i','n','g'} format.
Wasn't this added with C++11?
You are right (unfortunately). I tested with an older version of GCC (4.2) and a moderately new version of Clang, and both stumbled over it.
Patch retracted. (Would have been too nice.)
Gerald