4 Jan
2012
4 Jan
'12
9:35 a.m.
Assuming udisks support exists on the system, anything wrong with this? Does the new udisks do everything HAL used to do?
Thanks, Scott Ritchie
4 Jan
4 Jan
6:26 p.m.
New subject: Any bad side-effects from not building with HAL if udisks is enabled?
Scott Ritchie scott@open-vote.org writes:
Assuming udisks support exists on the system, anything wrong with this? Does the new udisks do everything HAL used to do?
If udisks is present, the HAL support is not used at all.
--
Alexandre Julliard
julliard@winehq.org
5 Jan
5 Jan
5:23 p.m.
New subject: Any bad side-effects from not building with HAL if udisks is enabled?
On 01/04/2012 10:26 AM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Scott Ritchie scott@open-vote.org writes:
Assuming udisks support exists on the system, anything wrong with this? Does the new udisks do everything HAL used to do?
If udisks is present, the HAL support is not used at all.
Perhaps the configure warning could be suppressed or changed in that condition?
Thanks, Scott Ritchie
4740
Age (days ago)
4741
Last active (days ago)
2 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Alexandre Julliard -
Scott Ritchie