I was looking at porting a small subset of msvcrt80.dll, and so I took a look at msvcrt20.dll.
I first used a disassembler to get a list of the functions in the native windows dll, ran a script over that, and then ran another script over msvcrt20.spec.
Much to my surprise, the wine implementation has more(!!) functions than the native dll. So, I was wondering, this screws up the index of these functions in the list, right? Does that index actually matter?
The diff between the 2 files is attached.
With kr,
Chipzz AKA Jan Van Buggenhout
Chipzz chipzz@ULYSSIS.Org writes:
Much to my surprise, the wine implementation has more(!!) functions than the native dll. So, I was wondering, this screws up the index of these functions in the list, right? Does that index actually matter?
No, the index doesn't matter, the functions are looked up by name, so it's mostly a cosmetic issue; but it should probably still be fixed.