Hi,
I saw that 'gather' is not creating the index.html file at test.winehq.org anymore.
I had a quick look at test.winehq.org and something seem to have go wrong with the patching of 'gather':
pvriens@wine:/home/winehq/opt/winetest$ perl gather Use of bare << to mean <<"" is deprecated at gather line 142. Use of bare << to mean <<"" is deprecated at gather line 171. Global symbol "$testref" requires explicit package name at gather line 142. Global symbol "$extrema" requires explicit package name at gather line 142. Global symbol "$extrema" requires explicit package name at gather line 142. Global symbol "$extrema" requires explicit package name at gather line 142. Global symbol "$extrema" requires explicit package name at gather line 142. Global symbol "$extrema" requires explicit package name at gather line 142. syntax error at gather line 176, near "HEAD:" (Might be a runaway multi-line << string starting on line 171) Execution of gather aborted due to compilation errors.
On Sun, 16 Mar 2008, Paul Vriens wrote:
Hi,
I saw that 'gather' is not creating the index.html file at test.winehq.org anymore.
I had a quick look at test.winehq.org and something seem to have go wrong with the patching of 'gather':
pvriens@wine:/home/winehq/opt/winetest$ perl gather Use of bare << to mean <<"" is deprecated at gather line 142. Use of bare << to mean <<"" is deprecated at gather line 171. Global symbol "$testref" requires explicit package name at gather line 142. Global symbol "$extrema" requires explicit package name at gather line 142. Global symbol "$extrema" requires explicit package name at gather line 142. Global symbol "$extrema" requires explicit package name at gather line 142. Global symbol "$extrema" requires explicit package name at gather line 142. Global symbol "$extrema" requires explicit package name at gather line 142. syntax error at gather line 176, near "HEAD:" (Might be a runaway multi-line << string starting on line 171) Execution of gather aborted due to compilation errors.
Yes, but I'm surprised because the pristine Git checkout I have here does not contain the word 'testref' and lines 142 and 171 don't contain '<<'. So it looks like what's being run does not correspond to what's in Git.
Francois Gouget fgouget@free.fr writes:
Yes, but I'm surprised because the pristine Git checkout I have here does not contain the word 'testref' and lines 142 and 171 don't contain '<<'. So it looks like what's being run does not correspond to what's in Git.
The problem is that someone (who shall remain nameless ;) committed changes directly to the mirror repository, so updating from the main repos failed. I've fixed it.