Hi Tom,
On Saturday 19 February 2005 03:56, you wrote:
can you take a couple minutes and look over our dll staus page and let me know of any changes that your aware of?
* As a rough guess, I would say that rsaenh.dll is 70% complete by now.
* I think we should get rid of the rsabase.dll entry on the status_dll site (and probably also in wine cvs): rsaenh.dll is a complete replacement and rsabase isn't shipped anymore by Microsoft since Win2k (Applications don't load rsabase/rsaenh directly, but via advapi32, which looks it up in the registry).
* I've just seen on the status page that I'm considered the 'recent primary worker' for secur32.dll, which I didn't write a line of code for. Did you mean this as some kind of subversive message? ;)
Not on the dll status page, but related:
* There is still an open 'RSA Crypto API' reference on the fun projects site. This should either be removed or be painted green (in which case rsabase has to be renamed rsaenh and the reference to openssl should be removed). It would be a pitty, if people would start implementing rsabase, since as I said I think it's dead code anyway.
* Just because there are changes to be made anyway: On the acknowledgements site I'm listed to have contributed to 'advapi/crypt.c'. My focus was clearly on 'rsaenh.dll' though.
Thanks,
Michael Jung wrote:
- As a rough guess, I would say that rsaenh.dll is 70% complete by now.
:-)
- I think we should get rid of the rsabase.dll entry on the status_dll site
(and probably also in wine cvs): rsaenh.dll is a complete replacement and rsabase isn't shipped anymore by Microsoft since Win2k (Applications don't load rsabase/rsaenh directly, but via advapi32, which looks it up in the registry).
When AJ removes it from CVS ill remove it from the status page.
- I've just seen on the status page that I'm considered the 'recent primary
worker' for secur32.dll, which I didn't write a line of code for. Did you mean this as some kind of subversive message? ;)
A cut & paste error on my part :-) i'll fix it in the next patch.
Thanks,
Tom
Michael Jung mjung@iss.tu-darmstadt.de writes:
- I think we should get rid of the rsabase.dll entry on the status_dll site
(and probably also in wine cvs): rsaenh.dll is a complete replacement and rsabase isn't shipped anymore by Microsoft since Win2k (Applications don't load rsabase/rsaenh directly, but via advapi32, which looks it up in the registry).
I'm not convinced we want to remove it completely, there just might be an app somewhere that looks for it explicitly, and it doesn't cost anything to keep it. We could remove the code though, and make it forward everything to rsaenh.