Hi,
I was still using the rpm's that Hans provided in the past. Some searching shows:
https://fcp.surfsite.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=61801&foru...
I've installed these rpm's but the executables use a different naming convention: i686-pc-mingw32* instead of what we check for: i686-mingw32*.
Should we add this to our configure?
On Tuesday 18 November 2008 22:48:11 Paul Vriens wrote:
https://fcp.surfsite.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=61801&foru...
I've installed these rpm's but the executables use a different naming convention: i686-pc-mingw32* instead of what we check for: i686-mingw32*.
Should we add this to our configure?
Looks promising! If Fedora accepts it under that name it's certainly worthwhile to add it to configure.
-Hans
"HL" == Hans Leidekker hans@codeweavers.com writes:
HL> Looks promising! If Fedora accepts it under that name it's HL> certainly worthwhile to add it to configure.
FYI, here are the mingw packages which have been submitted for Fedora: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&short_desc... It will take some time to get them all reviewed and into the system but you can browse the spec files there.
The gcc spec installs the compiler as {_bindir}/i686-pc-mingw32-gcc.
- J<