--- Paul van Schayck polleke@gmail.com wrote:
We do need this for winecfg. If you want to setup virtual drive you do want to see the full unix fs. Winecfg needs to have to unix paths. Putting conversion code in winecfg was not really acceptable, an extension to was.
This extension will become even more valuable because we want winecfg (or wine in particular) to start without having any virtual drive. People might have removed all drives (with winecfg).
Paul
But surely, for this particular winecfg program we don't need to add extensions to all of wine, right? I mean, if we extend the API this way, more will come. And it's actually easier to extend than to trim down, so I say we'd better not add this extension.
About winecfg, why not have a unix, text-based version of winecfg? More like Linux's make config IMO. Then when the drives are already set up, we can run the 'real' winecfg.
William Poetra Yoga Hadisoeseno
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com