This doesn't contain many actual tests yet, but provides the infrastructure for adding more tests and for verifying the finer details of how actual windows handles certain unwinding opcodes.
The tests added so far pass both on actual windows and on current wine.
Signed-off-by: Martin Storsjo martin@martin.st --- Rebased on current master, reordered to avoid potential fuzz in the diff. --- dlls/ntdll/tests/exception.c | 284 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 284 insertions(+)
diff --git a/dlls/ntdll/tests/exception.c b/dlls/ntdll/tests/exception.c index e75336ed11..dd9eb966fc 100644 --- a/dlls/ntdll/tests/exception.c +++ b/dlls/ntdll/tests/exception.c @@ -4225,6 +4225,285 @@ static void test_debug_service(DWORD numexc)
#elif defined(__aarch64__)
+#define UNW_FLAG_NHANDLER 0 +#define UNW_FLAG_EHANDLER 1 +#define UNW_FLAG_UHANDLER 2 + +#define UWOP_TWOBYTES(x) (((x) >> 8) & 0xff), ((x) & 0xff) + +#define UWOP_ALLOC_SMALL(size) (0x00 | (size / 16)) +#define UWOP_SAVE_REGP(reg, offset) UWOP_TWOBYTES((0xC8 << 8) | ((reg - 19) << 6) | (offset/8)) +#define UWOP_NOP 0xE5 +#define UWOP_END 0xE4 + +struct results +{ + int pc_offset; /* pc offset from code start */ + int fp_offset; /* fp offset from stack pointer */ + int handler; /* expect handler to be set? */ + ULONG_PTR pc; /* expected final pc value */ + int frame; /* expected frame return value */ + int frame_offset; /* whether the frame return value is an offset or an absolute value */ + int regs[32][2]; /* expected values for registers */ +}; + +struct unwind_test +{ + const BYTE *function; + size_t function_size; + const BYTE *unwind_info; + size_t unwind_size; + const struct results *results; + unsigned int nb_results; +}; + +enum regs +{ + x0, x1, x2, x3, x4, x5, x6, x7, + x8, x9, x10, x11, x12, x13, x14, x15, + x16, x17, x18, x19, x20, x21, x22, x23, + x24, x25, x26, x27, x28, x29, lr, sp +}; + +static const char * const reg_names[32] = +{ + "x0", "x1", "x2", "x3", "x4", "x5", "x6", "x7", + "x8", "x9", "x10", "x11", "x12", "x13", "x14", "x15", + "x16", "x17", "x18", "x19", "x20", "x21", "x22", "x23", + "x24", "x25", "x26", "x27", "x28", "x29", "lr", "sp" +}; + +#define ORIG_LR 0xCCCCCCCC + +#define UWOP(code,info) (UWOP_##code | ((info) << 4)) + +static void call_virtual_unwind( int testnum, const struct unwind_test *test ) +{ + static const int code_offset = 1024; + static const int unwind_offset = 2048; + void *handler, *data; + CONTEXT context; + RUNTIME_FUNCTION runtime_func; + KNONVOLATILE_CONTEXT_POINTERS ctx_ptr; + UINT i, j, k; + ULONG64 fake_stack[256]; + ULONG64 frame, orig_pc, orig_fp, unset_reg, sp_offset = 0; + static const UINT nb_regs = ARRAY_SIZE(test->results[i].regs); + + memcpy( (char *)code_mem + code_offset, test->function, test->function_size ); + memcpy( (char *)code_mem + unwind_offset, test->unwind_info, test->unwind_size ); + + runtime_func.BeginAddress = code_offset; + if (test->unwind_size) + runtime_func.UnwindData = unwind_offset; + else + memcpy(&runtime_func.UnwindData, test->unwind_info, 4); + + trace( "code: %p stack: %p\n", code_mem, fake_stack ); + + for (i = 0; i < test->nb_results; i++) + { + memset( &ctx_ptr, 0, sizeof(ctx_ptr) ); + memset( &context, 0x55, sizeof(context) ); + memset( &unset_reg, 0x55, sizeof(unset_reg) ); + for (j = 0; j < 256; j++) fake_stack[j] = j * 8; + + context.Sp = (ULONG_PTR)fake_stack; + context.Lr = (ULONG_PTR)ORIG_LR; + context.Fp = (ULONG_PTR)fake_stack + test->results[i].fp_offset; + orig_fp = context.Fp; + orig_pc = (ULONG64)code_mem + code_offset + test->results[i].pc_offset; + + trace( "%u/%u: pc=%p (%02x) fp=%p sp=%p\n", testnum, i, + (void *)orig_pc, *(DWORD *)orig_pc, (void *)orig_fp, (void *)context.Sp ); + + data = (void *)0xdeadbeef; + handler = RtlVirtualUnwind( UNW_FLAG_EHANDLER, (ULONG64)code_mem, orig_pc, + &runtime_func, &context, &data, &frame, &ctx_ptr ); + if (test->results[i].handler > 0) + { + /* Yet untested */ + ok( (char *)handler == (char *)code_mem + 0x200, + "%u/%u: wrong handler %p/%p\n", testnum, i, handler, (char *)code_mem + 0x200 ); + if (handler) ok( *(DWORD *)data == 0x08070605, + "%u/%u: wrong handler data %p\n", testnum, i, data ); + } + else + { + ok( handler == NULL, "%u/%u: handler %p instead of NULL\n", testnum, i, handler ); + } + + ok( context.Pc == test->results[i].pc, "%u/%u: wrong pc %p/%p\n", + testnum, i, (void *)context.Pc, (void*)test->results[i].pc ); + ok( frame == (test->results[i].frame_offset ? (ULONG64)fake_stack : 0) + test->results[i].frame, "%u/%u: wrong frame %p/%p\n", + testnum, i, (void *)frame, (char *)(test->results[i].frame_offset ? fake_stack : NULL) + test->results[i].frame ); + + sp_offset = 0; + for (k = 0; k < nb_regs; k++) + { + if (test->results[i].regs[k][0] == -1) + break; + if (test->results[i].regs[k][0] == sp) { + /* If sp is part of the registers list, treat it as an offset + * between the returned frame pointer and the sp register. */ + sp_offset = test->results[i].regs[k][1]; + break; + } + } + ok( frame - sp_offset == context.Sp, "%u/%u: wrong sp %p/%p\n", + testnum, i, (void *)frame - sp_offset, (void *)context.Sp); + + for (j = 0; j < 31; j++) /* Not including sp here */ + { + for (k = 0; k < nb_regs; k++) + { + if (test->results[i].regs[k][0] == -1) + { + k = nb_regs; + break; + } + if (test->results[i].regs[k][0] == j) break; + } + + if (j >= 19 && j <= 30 && (&ctx_ptr.X19)[j - 19]) + { + ok( k < nb_regs, "%u/%u: register %s should not be set to %llx\n", + testnum, i, reg_names[j], context.X[j] ); + if (k < nb_regs) + ok( context.X[j] == test->results[i].regs[k][1], + "%u/%u: register %s wrong %p/%x\n", + testnum, i, reg_names[j], (void *)context.X[j], test->results[i].regs[k][1] ); + } + else if (k < nb_regs) + { + ok( context.X[j] == test->results[i].regs[k][1], + "%u/%u: register %s wrong %p/%x\n", + testnum, i, reg_names[j], (void *)context.X[j], test->results[i].regs[k][1] ); + } + else + { + ok( k == nb_regs, "%u/%u: register %s should be set\n", testnum, i, reg_names[j] ); + if (j == lr) + ok( context.Lr == ORIG_LR, "%u/%u: register lr wrong %p/unset\n", + testnum, i, (void *)context.Lr ); + else if (j == x29) + ok( context.Fp == orig_fp, "%u/%u: register fp wrong %p/unset\n", + testnum, i, (void *)context.Fp ); + else + ok( context.X[j] == unset_reg, + "%u/%u: register %s wrong %p/unset\n", + testnum, i, reg_names[j], (void *)context.X[j]); + } + } + } +} + +#define DW(dword) ((dword >> 0) & 0xff), ((dword >> 8) & 0xff), ((dword >> 16) & 0xff), ((dword >> 24) & 0xff) + +static void test_virtual_unwind(void) +{ + static const BYTE function_0[] = + { + 0xff, 0x83, 0x00, 0xd1, /* 00: sub sp, sp, #32 */ + 0xf3, 0x53, 0x01, 0xa9, /* 04: stp x19, x20, [sp, #16] */ + 0x1f, 0x20, 0x03, 0xd5, /* 08: nop */ + 0xf3, 0x53, 0x41, 0xa9, /* 0c: ldp x19, x20, [sp, #16] */ + 0xff, 0x83, 0x00, 0x91, /* 10: add sp, sp, #32 */ + 0xc0, 0x03, 0x5f, 0xd6, /* 14: ret */ + }; + + static const DWORD unwind_info_0_header = + (sizeof(function_0)/4) | /* function length */ + (0 << 20) | /* X */ + (0 << 21) | /* E */ + (1 << 22) | /* epilog */ + (2 << 27); /* codes */ + static const DWORD unwind_info_0_epilog0 = + (3 << 0) | /* offset */ + (4 << 22); /* index */ + + static const BYTE unwind_info_0[] = + { + DW(unwind_info_0_header), + DW(unwind_info_0_epilog0), + + UWOP_SAVE_REGP(19, 16), /* stp x19, x20, [sp, #16] */ + UWOP_ALLOC_SMALL(32), /* sub sp, sp, #32 */ + UWOP_END, + + UWOP_SAVE_REGP(19, 16), /* stp x19, x20, [sp, #16] */ + UWOP_ALLOC_SMALL(32), /* sub sp, sp, #32 */ + UWOP_END, + }; + + static const struct results results_0[] = + { + /* offset fp handler pc frame offset registers */ + { 0x00, 0x00, 0, ORIG_LR, 0x000, TRUE, { {-1,-1} }}, + { 0x04, 0x00, 0, ORIG_LR, 0x020, TRUE, { {-1,-1} }}, + { 0x08, 0x00, 0, ORIG_LR, 0x020, TRUE, { {x19,0x10}, {x20,0x18}, {-1,-1} }}, + { 0x0c, 0x00, 0, ORIG_LR, 0x020, TRUE, { {x19,0x10}, {x20,0x18}, {-1,-1} }}, + { 0x10, 0x00, 0, ORIG_LR, 0x020, TRUE, { {-1,-1} }}, + { 0x14, 0x00, 0, ORIG_LR, 0x000, TRUE, { {-1,-1} }}, + }; + + + static const BYTE function_1[] = + { + 0xf3, 0x53, 0xbe, 0xa9, /* 00: stp x19, x20, [sp, #-32]! */ + 0xfe, 0x0b, 0x00, 0xf9, /* 04: str x30, [sp, #16] */ + 0xff, 0x43, 0x00, 0xd1, /* 08: sub sp, sp, #16 */ + 0x1f, 0x20, 0x03, 0xd5, /* 0c: nop */ + 0xff, 0x43, 0x00, 0x91, /* 10: add sp, sp, #16 */ + 0xfe, 0x0b, 0x40, 0xf9, /* 14: ldr x30, [sp, #16] */ + 0xf3, 0x53, 0xc2, 0xa8, /* 18: ldp x19, x20, [sp], #32 */ + 0xc0, 0x03, 0x5f, 0xd6, /* 1c: ret */ + }; + + static const DWORD unwind_info_1_packed = + (1 << 0) | /* Flag */ + (sizeof(function_1)/4 << 2) | /* FunctionLength */ + (0 << 13) | /* RegF */ + (2 << 16) | /* RegI */ + (0 << 20) | /* H */ + (1 << 21) | /* CR */ + (3 << 23); /* FrameSize */ + + static const BYTE unwind_info_1[] = { DW(unwind_info_1_packed) }; + + /* The prologue/epilogue locations are commented out below, as we don't + * handle those cases at the moment. */ + static const struct results results_1[] = + { + /* offset fp handler pc frame offset registers */ +#if 0 + { 0x00, 0x00, 0, ORIG_LR, 0x000, TRUE, { {-1,-1} }}, + { 0x04, 0x00, 0, ORIG_LR, 0x020, TRUE, { {x19,0x00}, {x20,0x08}, {-1,-1} }}, + { 0x08, 0x00, 0, 0x10, 0x020, TRUE, { {x19,0x00}, {x20,0x08}, {lr,0x10}, {-1,-1} }}, +#endif + { 0x0c, 0x00, 0, 0x20, 0x030, TRUE, { {x19,0x10}, {x20,0x18}, {lr,0x20}, {-1,-1} }}, + { 0x10, 0x00, 0, 0x20, 0x030, TRUE, { {x19,0x10}, {x20,0x18}, {lr,0x20}, {-1,-1} }}, +#if 0 + { 0x14, 0x00, 0, 0x10, 0x020, TRUE, { {x19,0x00}, {x20,0x08}, {lr,0x10}, {-1,-1} }}, + { 0x18, 0x00, 0, ORIG_LR, 0x020, TRUE, { {x19,0x00}, {x20,0x08}, {-1,-1} }}, + { 0x1c, 0x00, 0, ORIG_LR, 0x000, TRUE, { {-1,-1} }}, +#endif + }; + + static const struct unwind_test tests[] = + { +#define TEST(func, unwind, unwind_packed, results) \ + { func, sizeof(func), unwind, unwind_packed ? 0 : sizeof(unwind), results, ARRAY_SIZE(results) } + TEST(function_0, unwind_info_0, 0, results_0), + TEST(function_1, unwind_info_1, 1, results_1), +#undef TEST + }; + unsigned int i; + + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(tests); i++) + call_virtual_unwind( i, &tests[i] ); +} + static void test_thread_context(void) { CONTEXT context; @@ -5741,6 +6020,11 @@ START_TEST(exception) else skip( "Dynamic unwind functions not found\n" ); test_extended_context(); + +#elif defined(__aarch64__) + + test_virtual_unwind(); + #endif
test_debugger();
Hi,
While running your changed tests, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=77447
Your paranoid android.
=== build (build log) ===
error: patch failed: dlls/ntdll/tests/exception.c:5741 Task: Patch failed to apply
=== debiant (build log) ===
error: patch failed: dlls/ntdll/tests/exception.c:5741 Task: Patch failed to apply
=== debiant (build log) ===
error: patch failed: dlls/ntdll/tests/exception.c:5741 Task: Patch failed to apply
On Fri, 21 Aug 2020, Marvin wrote:
Hi,
While running your changed tests, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check?
Full results can be found at: https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=77447
Your paranoid android.
=== build (build log) ===
error: patch failed: dlls/ntdll/tests/exception.c:5741 Task: Patch failed to apply
This time, this should only be due to the testbot not using the very latest git version yet.
// Martin
-
Martin Storsjo -
Marvin