RE: .so dependancies in winegcc

[Pierre d'Herbemont]

Warren,

On Mac OS X/Darwin .so and .dylib extensions are both used. In fact 
.dylib extension is used for dynamic libraries (libwine*.dylib) whereas 
dll.so and exe.so extensions are used for the dlls and the exe. So your 
patch would break winegcc on Mac OS X.

Pierre.

.so dependancies in winegcc

Pierre d'Herbemont  wrote on 10/10/2004 01:50:39 PM:
> Warren,
>
> On Mac OS X/Darwin .so and .dylib extensions are both used. In fact 
> .dylib extension is used for dynamic libraries (libwine*.dylib) whereas 
> dll.so and exe.so extensions are used for the dlls and the exe. So your 
> patch would break winegcc on Mac OS X.'

Hi Pierre,

Thanks for the info - I didn't realize how that worked on the mac.   I've 
redone my changes so that SHLIBSUFFIX and EXESUFFIX stay .so and .exe.so 
on MacOSX, and I've left the special cases for .dylib in place.   Let me 
know if you think this looks more reasonable.

I've attached my re-worked patch.

Warren

--
Warren Baird, Technical Group Leader       [e-mail]
Cimmetry System Inc.                       514 735 3219 x148

.so dependancies in winegcc

Selon Warren_Baird/[e-mail]:
> Pierre d'Herbemont  wrote on 10/10/2004 01:50:39 PM:
> > Warren,
> >
> > On Mac OS X/Darwin .so and .dylib extensions are both used. In fact
> > .dylib extension is used for dynamic libraries (libwine*.dylib) whereas
> > dll.so and exe.so extensions are used for the dlls and the exe. So your
> > patch would break winegcc on Mac OS X.'
>
> Hi Pierre,
>
> Thanks for the info - I didn't realize how that worked on the mac.   I've
> redone my changes so that SHLIBSUFFIX and EXESUFFIX stay .so and .exe.so
> on MacOSX, and I've left the special cases for .dylib in place.   Let me
> know if you think this looks more reasonable.
>
> I've attached my re-worked patch.

Looks good for me, although I won't be able to test it on Mac OS X/Darwin for a
while.

Pierre