The Patch points to wine-cvs. Shouldn't it point to wine-devel.
Groeschel, Volker wrote:
The Patch points to wine-cvs. Shouldn't it point to wine-devel.
It points to wine-devel.
bye michael
No, it doesn't. <A HREF="http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-cvs">wine-devel at winehq.org</A>
Groeschel, Volker wrote:
At what are you looking at? The only email in wine-cvs with the Subject "Alexandre Julliard : winex11: Fix bug report address" is this commit http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=commit;h=075df1b609d283c5d0b83a3e1b... and the diff http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=commitdiff;h=075df1b609d283c5d0b83a... shows only this: + WARN("Skipping device %d [name %s|type %s]; not apparently a tablet cursor type device. If this is wrong, please report it to wine-devel@winehq.org\n",
I cannot see any wine-cvs in there.
bye michael
I apologize I was not looking in the diff but in the wine-cvs message http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-cvs/2008-March/041392.html
There it points to wine-cvs.
I don't know where this difference comes from.
Groeschel, Volker wrote:
The list archives obfuscate email addresses, adds links, etc. It looks like the website is translating wine-devel@redhat.com to "wine-devel at winehq.org" but adds a link to the wrong list archives.
Jeremy, do you want a bugzilla entry against the website for that?
bye michael
IMO, a better place to file a bug would be with the mailman devs. My policy is to try to keep with un-patched packages from Debian stable.
I can manually fix the archives though.
Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
Jeremy Newman wrote:
IMO, a better place to file a bug would be with the mailman devs. My
Huh? This looks to me like a configuration problem and not a mailman bug. I doubt that mailman knows on it's own to expand wine-devel@redhat.com to: <A HREF="http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-cvs">wine-devel at winehq.org</A>
bye michael
Groeschel, Volker wrote:
It's pipermail obfuscating the email addresses. (Same is true if you hover over "julliard at winehq.org").
But wouldn't be http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-devel better than wine-devel@winehq.org?
I just quote: "Note: You should be subscribed to the lists before you post to them, otherwise your posting will be treated as possible spam by the mailing list software."
Groeschel, Volker wrote:
No, you cannot report it to http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-devel as that are the read only archives. wine-devel has moderators and the emails from not subscribed people make it through though delayed. For a person reporting an one time problem that is ok to not be subscribed.
bye michael