The Patch points to wine-cvs. Shouldn't it point to wine-devel.
Groeschel, Volker wrote:
The Patch points to wine-cvs. Shouldn't it point to wine-devel.
It points to wine-devel.
bye michael
Groeschel, Volker wrote:
Groeschel, Volker wrote: The Patch points to wine-cvs. Shouldn't it point to wine-devel.
Stefaniuc, Michael wrote: It points to wine-devel.
No, it doesn't. <A HREF="http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-cvs">wine-devel at winehq.org</A>
At what are you looking at? The only email in wine-cvs with the Subject "Alexandre Julliard : winex11: Fix bug report address" is this commit http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=commit;h=075df1b609d283c5d0b83a3e1b... and the diff http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/?a=commitdiff;h=075df1b609d283c5d0b83a... shows only this: + WARN("Skipping device %d [name %s|type %s]; not apparently a tablet cursor type device. If this is wrong, please report it to wine-devel@winehq.org\n",
I cannot see any wine-cvs in there.
bye michael
I apologize I was not looking in the diff but in the wine-cvs message http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-cvs/2008-March/041392.html
There it points to wine-cvs.
I don't know where this difference comes from.
Groeschel, Volker wrote:
I apologize I was not looking in the diff but in the wine-cvs message http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-cvs/2008-March/041392.html
There it points to wine-cvs.
I don't know where this difference comes from.
The list archives obfuscate email addresses, adds links, etc. It looks like the website is translating wine-devel@redhat.com to "wine-devel at winehq.org" but adds a link to the wrong list archives.
Jeremy, do you want a bugzilla entry against the website for that?
bye michael
IMO, a better place to file a bug would be with the mailman devs. My policy is to try to keep with un-patched packages from Debian stable.
I can manually fix the archives though.
Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
Groeschel, Volker wrote:
I apologize I was not looking in the diff but in the wine-cvs message http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-cvs/2008-March/041392.html
There it points to wine-cvs.
I don't know where this difference comes from.
The list archives obfuscate email addresses, adds links, etc. It looks like the website is translating wine-devel@redhat.com to "wine-devel at winehq.org" but adds a link to the wrong list archives.
Jeremy, do you want a bugzilla entry against the website for that?
bye michael
Jeremy Newman wrote:
IMO, a better place to file a bug would be with the mailman devs. My
Huh? This looks to me like a configuration problem and not a mailman bug. I doubt that mailman knows on it's own to expand wine-devel@redhat.com to: <A HREF="http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-cvs">wine-devel at winehq.org</A>
bye michael
policy is to try to keep with un-patched packages from Debian stable. I can manually fix the archives though.
Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
Groeschel, Volker wrote:
I apologize I was not looking in the diff but in the wine-cvs message http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-cvs/2008-March/041392.html
There it points to wine-cvs.
I don't know where this difference comes from.
The list archives obfuscate email addresses, adds links, etc. It looks like the website is translating wine-devel@redhat.com to "wine-devel at winehq.org" but adds a link to the wrong list archives.
Jeremy, do you want a bugzilla entry against the website for that?
Groeschel, Volker wrote:
I apologize I was not looking in the diff but in the wine-cvs message http://www.winehq.org/pipermail/wine-cvs/2008-March/041392.html
There it points to wine-cvs.
I don't know where this difference comes from.
It's pipermail obfuscating the email addresses. (Same is true if you hover over "julliard at winehq.org").
But wouldn't be http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-devel better than wine-devel@winehq.org?
I just quote: "Note: You should be subscribed to the lists before you post to them, otherwise your posting will be treated as possible spam by the mailing list software."
Groeschel, Volker wrote:
But wouldn't be http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-devel better than wine-devel@winehq.org?
I just quote: "Note: You should be subscribed to the lists before you post to them, otherwise your posting will be treated as possible spam by the mailing list software."
No, you cannot report it to http://www.winehq.org/mailman/listinfo/wine-devel as that are the read only archives. wine-devel has moderators and the emails from not subscribed people make it through though delayed. For a person reporting an one time problem that is ok to not be subscribed.
bye michael
Groeschel, Volker wrote:
The Patch points to wine-cvs. Shouldn't it point to wine-devel.
Not in the version of the patch I'm looking at:
if (! is_tablet_cursor(target->name, device_type)) {
WARN("Skipping device %d [name %s|type %s]; not apparently a tablet cursor type device. If this is wrong, please report to http://forums.winehq.org\n",
WARN("Skipping device %d [name %s|type %s]; not apparently a tablet cursor type device. If this is wrong, please report it to wine-devel@winehq.org\n", loop, devices[loop].name, device_type ? device_type : ""); XFree(device_type); cursor_target --;