Re: [PATCH 3/5] d3drm/tests: Add refcount tests for IDirect3DRMFrame*. (v2)

[Stefan Dösinger]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Am 2016-06-15 um 10:35 schrieb Aaryaman Vasishta:
> - ok(ref1 == ref2, "Expected ref1 == ref2, got ref1 = %u, ref2 = %u.\n", ref1, ref2);
> - ok(ref2 == ref3, "Expected ref2 == ref3, got ref2 = %u, ref3 = %u.\n", ref2, ref3);
> - ok(ref1 == ref3, "Expected ref1 == ref3, got ref1 = %u, ref3 = %u.\n", ref1, ref3);

I think you can assume basic logic still applies to d3drm :-) . There's
no need to test ref1 == ref3 after you made sure (ref1 == ref2 && ref2
== ref3) .

More importantly though, patch 5 somewhat suggests that you're planning
to have a full-blown QI and refcounting test for frames too. If that's
the case there's no need to add this patch.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=2nxr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----