Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=20380
Your paranoid android.
=== w1064 (32 bit locale) === locale.c:2353: Test failed: LCMapStringEx should fail with bad locale name locale.c:2354: Test failed: unexpected error code -559038737 locale.c:2445: Test failed: Expected lcid == 0, got got 00001000, error -559038737 locale.c:4168: Test failed: IsValidLocaleName should have failed locale.c:4170: Test failed: IsValidLocaleName should have failed locale.c:4535: Test failed: For id 7, expected ret == 4, got 1, error 87 locale.c:4537: Test failed: For id 7, Expected IVC, got ''
On 12.02.2016 09:11, Marvin wrote:
Hi,
While running your changed tests on Windows, I think I found new failures. Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be wrong, but could you please double-check? Full results can be found at https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=20380
Your paranoid android.
=== w1064 (32 bit locale) === locale.c:2353: Test failed: LCMapStringEx should fail with bad locale name locale.c:2354: Test failed: unexpected error code -559038737 locale.c:2445: Test failed: Expected lcid == 0, got got 00001000, error -559038737 locale.c:4168: Test failed: IsValidLocaleName should have failed locale.c:4170: Test failed: IsValidLocaleName should have failed locale.c:4535: Test failed: For id 7, expected ret == 4, got 1, error 87 locale.c:4537: Test failed: For id 7, Expected IVC, got ''
As already mentioned in the patch introduction, those failures are unrelated.