Re: Bugzilla, was Re: wineconf summary

[Jeremy Newman]

On Tue, 2002-03-19 at 09:19, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
> On March 19, 2002 08:49 am, Andriy Palamarchuk wrote:
> > We already have such list. It is called "wine-user"
>
> I'm not sold on the benefit of a bugs list either. We aren't that many 
> people, there's no point into slicing the traffic too much at this point.

Actually, on winehq.com there still is a wine-bugs mailing list. What I
can do is setup the Bugzilla database to send emails to that list when
new bugs are added etc. We have been using a [e-mail] email
account to monitor this already. All I would need to do is forward those
emails to that list.

Also, the list could be setup like wine-patches, where replies to bugs
go to wine-users but not back to the wine-bugs list. In essence the
wine-bugs list would be browse only.

Thoughts?

Bugzilla, was Re: wineconf summary

[Andriy Palamarchuk]

--- Jeremy Newman  wrote:
> Also, the list could be setup like wine-patches,
> where replies to bugs
> go to wine-users but not back to the wine-bugs list.
> In essence the
> wine-bugs list would be browse only.

I like this approach. Did not think in this way. 
I'm for it.

Andriy Palamarchuk

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage
http://sports.yahoo.com/