Re: [USER] 'Fix' SetWindowsHookEx

[Shachar Shemesh]

Lionel Ulmer wrote:
> I have no idea if it's correct
> though (as I do not know if what GetModuleHandle returns is really the same
> thing as what SetWindowsHookEx expects as an HINSTANCE input).

Yes, it is. It's just used to grab the procedure address to call when 
the hook is activated.
> Index: dlls/user/hook.c
>
> RCS file: /home/wine/wine/dlls/user/hook.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.12
> diff -u -r1.12 hook.c
> --- dlls/user/hook.c	19 May 2004 03:22:55 -0000	1.12
> +++ dlls/user/hook.c	12 Jun 2004 15:27:01 -0000
> @@ -141,11 +141,15 @@
>     else  /* system-global hook */
>     {
>         if (id == WH_KEYBOARD_LL || id == WH_MOUSE_LL) inst = 0;
> -
>    else if (!inst || !(len = GetModuleFileNameW( inst, module, MAX_PATH )) || len >= MAX_PATH)
> -
>    {
> -
>        SetLastError( ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER );
> -
>        return 0;
> -
>    }

If you just remove the "!inst" test, does the game work? I think that 
would be simpler.

Shachar