Should we modify the winelib documentation? The docs make it sound like its an easy two step process.
Yes, we should. We should also modify winemaker to: 1. Generate MinGW compatible Makefiles 2. Use winegcc to achive (1) 3. Drop the configure script altogether. With winegcc there's no need for a configure script anymore, and besides, using autoconf is project policy, not something we should force down people's throats.
Also, is there a way to get wrc to extract all of the objects in an rc file?
What do you mean by this?
-- Dimi.
On Tuesday 23 December 2003 02:38 pm, Dimitrie O. Paun wrote:
Should we modify the winelib documentation? The docs make it sound like its an easy two step process.
Yes, we should. We should also modify winemaker to:
- Generate MinGW compatible Makefiles
- Use winegcc to achive (1)
- Drop the configure script altogether. With winegcc there's no need for a configure script anymore, and besides, using autoconf is project policy, not something we should force down people's throats.
Also, is there a way to get wrc to extract all of the objects in an rc file?
What do you mean by this?
Doh, I meant bin2res. After making clean I need to extract them like: ../../tools/bin2res -o faces.bmp ./rsrc.rc
Otherwise they aren't available when wrc runs on rsrc.rc. Seems odd that wrc can't pull the data out of the rsrc.rc file itself though.
Chris