I wanted to experiment with these, but I'm not sure of their current state. Do they still apply cleanly? Are they on track for eventual inclusion? I'm willing to help provide community testing by putting them in a special package repository.
Thanks, Scott Ritchie
On Sat, Feb 6, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Scott Ritchie scott@open-vote.org wrote:
I wanted to experiment with these, but I'm not sure of their current state. Do they still apply cleanly? Are they on track for eventual inclusion? I'm willing to help provide community testing by putting them in a special package repository.
A while back I sent some of the header files patches in, and now the rest doesn't apply cleanly :-(. Sorry.
Thanks, Scott Ritchie
Good luck Damjan
<<
A while back I sent some of the header files patches in, and now the rest doesn't apply cleanly :-(. Sorry.
Good luck Damjan
<<
A while back I sent some of the header files patches in, and now the rest doesn't apply cleanly :-(. Sorry.
Good luck Damjan
How bad is it? Are the changes required to make them "apply-able" fairly obvious? Are Etersoft still involved and will follow it up or is it waiting for another?
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 4:42 PM, k4king k.king177@ntlworld.com wrote:
<<
A while back I sent some of the header files patches in, and now the rest doesn't apply cleanly :-(. Sorry.
Good luck Damjan
How bad is it?
2 header files were out of date. More may have changed in the meanwhile.
Are the changes required to make them "apply-able" fairly obvious?
For the header files, yes they were.
Are Etersoft still involved and will follow it up or is it waiting for another?
Here's the conversation I had with Alexander Morozov, the author of the patch:
Q: Are you still working on the Wine USB patches?
A: Yes, but not many.
Q: Are you still trying to get them accepted into Wine?
A: No.
...
Q: If you don't want to send patches to Wine, can I send them with copyright assigned to both of us?
A: I have nothing against including USB patches in wine. You can try to send them to wine mailing list.
Damjan