[PATCH v2 9/9] adsldp/tests: Handle more cases of ERROR_DS_SERVER_DOWN.

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

Probably server protects itself from quick successive connections
from the same client and returns LDAP_SERVER_DOWN.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Timoshkov 
---
 dlls/adsldp/ldap.c       |  2 +-
 dlls/adsldp/tests/ldap.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/dlls/adsldp/ldap.c b/dlls/adsldp/ldap.c
index c23f46267e..37a990ad81 100644
--- a/dlls/adsldp/ldap.c
+++ b/dlls/adsldp/ldap.c
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ DWORD map_ldap_error(DWORD err)
     case LDAP_NO_OBJECT_CLASS_MODS:     return ERROR_DS_CANT_MOD_OBJ_CLASS;
     case LDAP_RESULTS_TOO_LARGE:        return ERROR_DS_OBJECT_RESULTS_TOO_LARGE;
     case LDAP_AFFECTS_MULTIPLE_DSAS:    return ERROR_DS_AFFECTS_MULTIPLE_DSAS;
-    case LDAP_SERVER_DOWN:              return  ERROR_DS_SERVER_DOWN;
+    case LDAP_SERVER_DOWN:              return ERROR_DS_SERVER_DOWN;
     case LDAP_LOCAL_ERROR:              return ERROR_DS_LOCAL_ERROR;
     case LDAP_ENCODING_ERROR:           return ERROR_DS_ENCODING_ERROR;
     case LDAP_DECODING_ERROR:           return ERROR_DS_DECODING_ERROR;
diff --git a/dlls/adsldp/tests/ldap.c b/dlls/adsldp/tests/ldap.c
index aec5bf89ee..b3cb489d58 100644
--- a/dlls/adsldp/tests/ldap.c
+++ b/dlls/adsldp/tests/ldap.c
@@ -106,11 +106,23 @@ static void test_LDAP(void)
             IDispatch_Release(disp);

hr = ADsOpenObject(path, user, password, test[i].flags, &IID_IADs, (void **)&ads);
+        if (hr == HRESULT_FROM_WIN32(ERROR_DS_SERVER_DOWN))
+        {
+            SysFreeString(path);
+            skip("server is down\n");
+            break;
+        }
         ok(hr == test[i].hr || hr == test[i].hr_ads_get, "%d: got %#x, expected %#x\n", i, hr, test[i].hr);
         if (hr == S_OK)
             IADs_Release(ads);

hr = ADsGetObject(path, &IID_IDispatch, (void **)&disp);
+        if (hr == HRESULT_FROM_WIN32(ERROR_DS_SERVER_DOWN))
+        {
+            SysFreeString(path);
+            skip("server is down\n");
+            break;
+        }
         ok(hr == test[i].hr || hr == test[i].hr_ads_get, "%d: got %#x, expected %#x\n", i, hr, test[i].hr);
         if (hr == S_OK)
             IDispatch_Release(disp);
@@ -337,8 +349,12 @@ todo_wine
     ok(hr == E_NOINTERFACE, "got %#x\n", hr);

hr = ADsGetObject(L"LDAP://ldap.forumsys.com", &IID_IDirectorySearch, (void **)&ds);
+    if (hr == HRESULT_FROM_WIN32(ERROR_DS_SERVER_DOWN))
+    {
+        skip("server is down\n");
+        return;
+    }
     ok(hr == S_OK, "got %#x\n", hr);
-    if (hr != S_OK) return;

pref.dwSearchPref = ADS_SEARCHPREF_SEARCH_SCOPE;
     pref.vValue.dwType = ADSTYPE_INTEGER;

[Marvin]

Hi,

While running your changed tests, I think I found new failures.
Being a bot and all I'm not very good at pattern recognition, so I might be
wrong, but could you please double-check?

Full results can be found at:
https://testbot.winehq.org/JobDetails.pl?Key=68456

Your paranoid android.

=== wxppro (32 bit report) ===

adsldp:
ldap.c:442: Test failed: got 00263BB0