Re: [PATCH 5/5] wined3d: Move the "draw_binding" field from struct wined3d_surface to struct wined3d_resource.

[Stefan Dösinger]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 2014-08-04 12:17, schrieb Henri Verbeet:
> @@ -2029,6 +2029,7 @@ struct wined3d_resource
>      DWORD usage;
>      enum wined3d_pool pool;
>      DWORD access_flags;
> - DWORD draw_binding;

Will this stay in wined3d_resource, or do you plan to move this to wined3d_(render_target_)view later on?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=F1T9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[PATCH 5/5] wined3d: Move the "draw_binding" field from struct wined3d_surface to struct wined3d_resource.

[Henri Verbeet]

On 4 August 2014 16:06, Stefan Dösinger  wrote:
> Am 2014-08-04 12:17, schrieb Henri Verbeet:
> > @@ -2029,6 +2029,7 @@ struct wined3d_resource
> >      DWORD usage;
> >      enum wined3d_pool pool;
> >      DWORD access_flags;
> > - DWORD draw_binding;
>
> Will this stay in wined3d_resource, or do you plan to move this to wined3d_(render_target_)view later on?

I suppose it might move, but I don't know yet. At this point I see no
strong reason to prefer storing it in the view over storing it in the
resource.