Vincent Béron vberon@mecano.gme.usherb.ca writes:
Is this acceptable?
libxslt/xslt.h was never included, so I got rid of it.
The variable declarations weren't protected with the HAVE_LIBXSLT_*_H macros, so I simplified the test and removed the macros.
I think keeping the standard header check is better. What didn't work with your previous solution?
Le mer 14/09/2005 à 06:20, Alexandre Julliard a écrit :
Vincent Béron vberon@mecano.gme.usherb.ca writes:
Is this acceptable?
libxslt/xslt.h was never included, so I got rid of it.
The variable declarations weren't protected with the HAVE_LIBXSLT_*_H macros, so I simplified the test and removed the macros.
I think keeping the standard header check is better. What didn't work with your previous solution?
Nothing, I simply misunderstood your comment "Looks good to me" while answering Mike's proposal of an AC_TRY_COMPILE() test, and the patch wasn't applied yet, so I jumped to some wrong conclusions :)
Note that libxslt/xslt.h is still unused in Wine's code, so I don't see why we check for it. Also, even if the header inclusion is protected, variable declarations using types from those headers are not, so if one is missing you'll still get a compilation error during make.
I'll resubmit the first patch with the libxslt/xslt.h check removed.
Vincent