Re: [4/4] msi: Test installing over in-use files.

[Paul Vriens]

On 09/29/2009 02:57 PM, Hans Leidekker wrote:
> - static char key[]   = "System\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager";
> - static char value[] = "PendingFileRenameOperations";
> -
> - RegOpenKeyExA(HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE, key, 0, KEY_ALL_ACCESS,&hkey);
> - if (!RegQueryValueExA(hkey, value, NULL, NULL, NULL,&size))
> - {
> -
>    skip("Pending file rename operations, skipping test\n");
> -
>    return;

Hi Hans,

(In response to this and the previous patch concerning pending renames).

Win9x and WinMe act differently on pending renames (as usual :( ). 
Instead of using the registry some entries are written into 
%windir%\WinInit.ini.

Is it worthwhile to have the tests cope with this or should we just skip 
them on Win9x/WinMe?

[4/4] msi: Test installing over in-use files.

[Hans Leidekker]

On Thursday 01 October 2009 08:46:13 pm Paul Vriens wrote:
> > - RegOpenKeyExA(HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE, key, 0, KEY_ALL_ACCESS,&hkey);
> > - if (!RegQueryValueExA(hkey, value, NULL, NULL, NULL,&size))
> > - {
> > -
> >    skip("Pending file rename operations, skipping test\n");
> > -
> >    return;
>
> Hi Hans,
>
> (In response to this and the previous patch concerning pending renames).
>
> Win9x and WinMe act differently on pending renames (as usual :( ). 
> Instead of using the registry some entries are written into 
> %windir%\WinInit.ini.
>
> Is it worthwhile to have the tests cope with this or should we just skip 
> them on Win9x/WinMe?

I don't think it's worthwhile, lets just skip them on 9x.

-Hans