"Erich E. Hoover" erich.e.hoover@gmail.com wrote:
Currently CreateDirectory mostly ignores the security attributes on directories. This patch adds some tests for what happens when these attributes are present and part 2 adds support for setting these attributes.
This patch duplicates already existing tests in dlls/advapi32/tests/security.c.
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 10:48 PM, Dmitry Timoshkov dmitry@baikal.ru wrote:
"Erich E. Hoover" erich.e.hoover@gmail.com wrote:
Currently CreateDirectory mostly ignores the security attributes on directories. This patch adds some tests for what happens when these attributes are present and part 2 adds support for setting these attributes.
This patch duplicates already existing tests in dlls/advapi32/tests/security.c.
In advapi32 I was trying to test Set[Named]SecurityInfo, here I'm trying to test CreateDirectory (a kernel32 component). Would you prefer that this test be in advapi32?
Best, Erich
"Erich E. Hoover" erich.e.hoover@gmail.com wrote:
Currently CreateDirectory mostly ignores the security attributes on directories. This patch adds some tests for what happens when these attributes are present and part 2 adds support for setting these attributes.
This patch duplicates already existing tests in dlls/advapi32/tests/security.c.
In advapi32 I was trying to test Set[Named]SecurityInfo, here I'm trying to test CreateDirectory (a kernel32 component). Would you prefer that this test be in advapi32?
Yes, it would be better to have these tests in one place, that would also avoid duplicating all those soft API imports.