Nikolay Sivov nsivov@codeweavers.com writes:
@@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ static const char* debugscrollinfo(const SCROLLINFO *pScrollInfo) int len, size = DEBUG_BUFFER_SIZE;
if (pScrollInfo == NULL) return "(null)";
- len = snprintf(buf, size, "{cbSize=%d, ", pScrollInfo->cbSize);
- len = snprintf(buf, size, "{cbSize=%u, ", pScrollInfo->cbSize);
That doesn't seem very necessary. I don't mind a few fixes like that, but I'm concerned that there would be a million of them. How many do you expect?
On 10/28/2015 01:35 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Nikolay Sivov nsivov@codeweavers.com writes:
@@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ static const char* debugscrollinfo(const SCROLLINFO *pScrollInfo) int len, size = DEBUG_BUFFER_SIZE;
if (pScrollInfo == NULL) return "(null)";
- len = snprintf(buf, size, "{cbSize=%d, ", pScrollInfo->cbSize);
- len = snprintf(buf, size, "{cbSize=%u, ", pScrollInfo->cbSize);
That doesn't seem very necessary. I don't mind a few fixes like that, but I'm concerned that there would be a million of them. How many do you expect?
PVS-Studio has 266 defects for this. 3 of those are a double <==> long double mismatch. The rest are all signed/unsigned stuff.
bye michael
On 28.10.2015 16:11, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
On 10/28/2015 01:35 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Nikolay Sivov nsivov@codeweavers.com writes:
@@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ static const char* debugscrollinfo(const SCROLLINFO *pScrollInfo) int len, size = DEBUG_BUFFER_SIZE;
if (pScrollInfo == NULL) return "(null)";
- len = snprintf(buf, size, "{cbSize=%d, ", pScrollInfo->cbSize);
- len = snprintf(buf, size, "{cbSize=%u, ", pScrollInfo->cbSize);
That doesn't seem very necessary. I don't mind a few fixes like that, but I'm concerned that there would be a million of them. How many do you expect?
PVS-Studio has 266 defects for this. 3 of those are a double <==> long double mismatch. The rest are all signed/unsigned stuff.
Right, many could be combined to a single patch, and some parts warnings from programs/ we can ignore probably, so it would be less. So not a million, but maybe about 50 total or so. I'm okay skipping this if you think it's useless.
bye michael
Nikolay Sivov nsivov@codeweavers.com writes:
On 28.10.2015 16:11, Michael Stefaniuc wrote:
On 10/28/2015 01:35 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Nikolay Sivov nsivov@codeweavers.com writes:
@@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ static const char* debugscrollinfo(const SCROLLINFO *pScrollInfo) int len, size = DEBUG_BUFFER_SIZE; if (pScrollInfo == NULL) return "(null)";
- len = snprintf(buf, size, "{cbSize=%d, ", pScrollInfo->cbSize);
- len = snprintf(buf, size, "{cbSize=%u, ", pScrollInfo->cbSize);
That doesn't seem very necessary. I don't mind a few fixes like that, but I'm concerned that there would be a million of them. How many do you expect?
PVS-Studio has 266 defects for this. 3 of those are a double <==> long double mismatch. The rest are all signed/unsigned stuff.
Right, many could be combined to a single patch, and some parts warnings from programs/ we can ignore probably, so it would be less. So not a million, but maybe about 50 total or so. I'm okay skipping this if you think it's useless.
If it's around 50 patches, that's OK.