Do we want to see untranslated modules on the translations page for "English (United States)"?

[Paul Vriens]

Hi,

If a module does not have any translatable resources (for examples 
dlls/atl) we don't show this module on the language pages.

We do however show it on the "English (United States)" one:

http://source.winehq.org/transl/lang.php?lang=009%3A01

Do we still want that, or can it be removed so that it matches the other 
languages?

I'm asking as when you go to:

http://source.winehq.org/transl/resfile.php?lang=009%3A01&resfile=dlls%2...

you'll see that the text is not correct (the first link will get you to 
this same page).

So we either remove the modules that are not translatable from the 
"English (United States)" page or we have to change that piece of text.

Do we want to see untranslated modules on the translations page for "English (United States)"?

[Michael Stefaniuc]

Hi Paul,

Paul Vriens wrote:
> If a module does not have any translatable resources (for examples
> dlls/atl) we don't show this module on the language pages.
>
> We do however show it on the "English (United States)" one:

yeah, that confused me too when splitting out the rc file handling in
the Makefile. Had 80+ resource files but the script could find only 60+.
> http://source.winehq.org/transl/lang.php?lang=009%3A01
>
> Do we still want that, or can it be removed so that it matches the other
> languages?

I would say to remove it. As there is nothing to translate there is
nothing to show. Or maybe put them into a separate list "Wine modules
without i18n support".
> I'm asking as when you go to:
>
> http://source.winehq.org/transl/resfile.php?lang=009%3A01&resfile=dlls%2...
>
> you'll see that the text is not correct (the first link will get you to
> this same page).
>
> So we either remove the modules that are not translatable from the
> "English (United States)" page or we have to change that piece of text.

bye
    michael