Re: kernel32/tests: Pass test on error code returned by Windows 7

[Dmitry Kislyuk]

--- On Mon, 10/5/09, Paul Vriens  wrote:

From: Paul Vriens 
Subject: Re: kernel32/tests: Pass test on error code returned by Windows 7
To: "Dmitry Kislyuk" 
Cc: [e-mail]
Date: Monday, October 5, 2009, 12:49 AM

On 10/05/2009 05:09 AM, Dmitry Kislyuk wrote:
> --- On *Sun, 10/4/09, Paul Vriens //* wrote:
>
> From: Paul Vriens 
>      Subject: Re: kernel32/tests: Pass test on error code returned by
>      Windows 7
>      To: [e-mail]
>      Cc: [e-mail]
>      Date: Sunday, October 4, 2009, 4:20 AM
>
> On 10/04/2009 09:10 AM, Dmitry Kislyuk wrote:
>       >> + ok( GetLastError() == 0xdeadbeef || GetLastError() == 2 /* Win
>      7 */,
>       >> + "expected 0xdeadbeef or 2, got %d\n", GetLastError());
>
> >Don't use magic numbers, ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND would be better.
>
> >-- Cheers,
>
> >Paul.
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> All of the tests in this group of tests are the same way. Magic
>      numbers instead of defines. I wanted to stay consistent with that.
>
> If Alexandre doesn't apply it I will resend with using
>      ERROR_FILE_NOT_FOUND per your suggestion.
>
> Thank you for looking at my patch.
>
> Dmitry
> Hi Dmitry,
> The 'magical numbers' you are talking about in profile.c are not error 
> codes but the return values from for example GetPrivateProfileStringA 
> (number of characters).
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Paul.

Thank you,
I modified the patch and resent it.

Dmitry