On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 18:22, Igor Egorov atohom@gmail.com wrote:
This is my first patch, not sure if I done all right.
I didn't look at the actual change, but:
mode change 100644 => 100755 dlls/kernel32/process.c
doesn't seem necessary to me.
On 02/04/2011 06:25 PM, Austin English wrote:
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 18:22, Igor Egorovatohom@gmail.com wrote:
This is my first patch, not sure if I done all right.
I didn't look at the actual change, but:
mode change 100644 => 100755 dlls/kernel32/process.c
doesn't seem necessary to me.
Yes, thanks, I resent the patch