I don't fully understand the spec, so I could be wrong about this, but I think for texture brushes we'll need the ability to create an EmfPlusImage structure without an EmfPlusObject record.
On 06/28/17 21:07, Vincent Povirk wrote:
I don't fully understand the spec, so I could be wrong about this, but I think for texture brushes we'll need the ability to create an EmfPlusImage structure without an EmfPlusObject record.
I've done some basic tests and EmfPlusImage record is used for texture brushes. In my brush test image was stored in PNG format. I've moved the code to separate functions so it can be reused later.
Thanks, Piotr
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 5:49 AM, Piotr Caban piotr.caban@gmail.com wrote:
I've done some basic tests and EmfPlusImage record is used for texture brushes. In my brush test image was stored in PNG format. I've moved the code to separate functions so it can be reused later.
OK, I must be missing something in the spec that makes this possible, or the spec is wrong. In that case, I'll review the earlier version.
On 06/29/17 18:21, Vincent Povirk wrote:
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 5:49 AM, Piotr Caban piotr.caban@gmail.com wrote:
I've done some basic tests and EmfPlusImage record is used for texture brushes. In my brush test image was stored in PNG format. I've moved the code to separate functions so it can be reused later.
OK, I must be missing something in the spec that makes this possible, or the spec is wrong. In that case, I'll review the earlier version.
I guess you misunderstood me - the PNG is stored in EmfPlusImage that is not stored inside EmfPlusObject. This means that the code can be reused for brush texture implementation. I think this makes v2 attempt better.
Thanks, Piotr
-
Piotr Caban -
Vincent Povirk