Henri Verbeet hverbeet@codeweavers.com writes:
diff --git a/dlls/winex11.drv/xrandr.c b/dlls/winex11.drv/xrandr.c index 83137a4..a8dccd4 100644 --- a/dlls/winex11.drv/xrandr.c +++ b/dlls/winex11.drv/xrandr.c @@ -289,6 +289,12 @@ done: wine_tsx11_unlock(); }
+void X11DRV_XRandR_Cleanup(void) +{
- HeapFree( GetProcessHeap(), 0, real_xrandr_rates_count );
- HeapFree( GetProcessHeap(), 0, real_xrandr_rates );
+}
It's not worth adding complexity to free memory, in practice the graphics driver is never going to be unloaded except at process exit.
On 12 July 2012 18:46, Alexandre Julliard julliard@winehq.org wrote:
It's not worth adding complexity to free memory, in practice the graphics driver is never going to be unloaded except at process exit.
I suppose, although I think in principle we'd also want to clean things up when e.g. switching to virtual desktop mode. Either way, winex11 isn't entirely consistent in this regard.