On 18.02.2016 09:58, Sebastian Lackner wrote:
I'd like to add the remark, that depending on the logic of the anti-debugger trick, more work is necessary for proper int $0x2d support on x86_64. What we also need is the equivalent of http://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git/patch/eab168cf9eaa6ed9f8800b25155d3293... for x86_64. I'll take care of that when I know that the first three patches are fine.