Piotr Caban piotr@codeweavers.com writes:
@@ -890,6 +890,7 @@ struct rawinput_device obj_handle_t handle; /* duplicated handle in dst process */ int self; /* is the source the current process? */ int closed; /* whether the source handle has been closed */
- int reused; /* whether the source handle has been reused */
I don't think you need an extra flag, there's nothing the client has to do differently in that case (the warning is mostly cosmetic anyway).
On 06/04/13 21:56, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Piotr Caban piotr@codeweavers.com writes:
@@ -890,6 +890,7 @@ struct rawinput_device obj_handle_t handle; /* duplicated handle in dst process */ int self; /* is the source the current process? */ int closed; /* whether the source handle has been closed */
- int reused; /* whether the source handle has been reused */
I don't think you need an extra flag, there's nothing the client has to do differently in that case (the warning is mostly cosmetic anyway).
I'll send a patch with the warning message removed unless you think that it's better to keep it.
Thanks, Piotr