Re: WLDAP32: link to the reentrant version of libldap

[Alexandre Julliard]

Hans Leidekker  writes:
> On Monday 19 December 2005 20:47, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
> > It's really not much more work to do it right the first time around,
>
> Thanks for calling me lazy ;-) I wasn't worried about the amount of
> work, I was looking ahead thinking about how distro x version y might
> need another check for some missing functions, and they would start
> adding up. There was a time when the ldap_*_ext functions didn't
> exist for example. This library has quite a long history.

All the more reason to check for the functions we are actually
using. If there are more library variants to check for, it won't be
manageable to only check for a function or two and then attempt to
guess which other functions may or may not be defined.