Michael Stefaniuc mstefani@redhat.de writes:
The Wine code doesn't seem to pass a 16bit hinstance to LoadCursor/LoadIcon; the only calls to those functions from 16bit code use a 0 hinstance which is fine.
16-bit instances can come from 32-bit calls too, if we are dealing with a 16-bit window.
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Michael Stefaniuc mstefani@redhat.de writes:
The Wine code doesn't seem to pass a 16bit hinstance to LoadCursor/LoadIcon; the only calls to those functions from 16bit code use a 0 hinstance which is fine.
16-bit instances can come from 32-bit calls too, if we are dealing with a 16-bit window.
Hehehe, that was just a "probe patch" to describe the problem. Will you accept the standard if((ULONG_PTR)hinstance >> 16) patch or do you want to fix the problem yourself? ;)
bye michael
Michael Stefaniuc mstefani@redhat.com writes:
Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Michael Stefaniuc mstefani@redhat.de writes:
The Wine code doesn't seem to pass a 16bit hinstance to LoadCursor/LoadIcon; the only calls to those functions from 16bit code use a 0 hinstance which is fine.
16-bit instances can come from 32-bit calls too, if we are dealing with a 16-bit window.
Hehehe, that was just a "probe patch" to describe the problem. Will you accept the standard if((ULONG_PTR)hinstance >> 16) patch or do you want to fix the problem yourself? ;)
The standard fix is fine.
-
Alexandre Julliard -
Michael Stefaniuc