winver

I've noticed that wine doesn't yet seem to have a winver option for windows server
2003, I suppose it a trivial thing to implement, at least by seeing how quickly
this was done for windows xp.

[Shachar Shemesh]

[e-mail] wrote:
> I've noticed that wine doesn't yet seem to have a winver option for windows server
> 2003, I suppose it a trivial thing to implement, at least by seeing how quickly
> this was done for windows xp.

If anyone needs to run regression tests on Windows 2003 Server, I can 
lay my hands on one (and many other, if needed)

Shachar

[Vincent Béron]

Le ven 01/08/2003 à 13:02, Shachar Shemesh a écrit :
> [e-mail] wrote:
> > I've noticed that wine doesn't yet seem to have a winver option for windows server
> > 2003, I suppose it a trivial thing to implement, at least by seeing how quickly
> > this was done for windows xp.
>
> If anyone needs to run regression tests on Windows 2003 Server, I can 
> lay my hands on one (and many other, if needed)

Could you just send the result of GetVersionExA?

I think I have everything else (at least to define the version...)

Vincent

[Shachar Shemesh]

Vincent Béron wrote:
> Le ven 01/08/2003 à 13:02, Shachar Shemesh a écrit :
> > [e-mail] wrote:
> > > I've noticed that wine doesn't yet seem to have a winver option for windows server
> > > 2003, I suppose it a trivial thing to implement, at least by seeing how quickly
> > > this was done for windows xp.
> >
> > If anyone needs to run regression tests on Windows 2003 Server, I can 
> > lay my hands on one (and many other, if needed)
>
> Could you just send the result of GetVersionExA?
>
> I think I have everything else (at least to define the version...)
>
> Vincent

Windows 2003 Standard Edition (let me know if you want another edition):
Majour Version: 5
Minor Version: 2
Build Number: 3790
Platform ID: 2
CSDVersion empty (NULLs)
ServicePackMajor: 0
ServicePackMinor: 0
Reserved: 272, 3

[Vincent Béron]

Le mer 13/08/2003 à 01:40, Shachar Shemesh a écrit :
> Vincent Béron wrote:
> > Could you just send the result of GetVersionExA?
> >
> > I think I have everything else (at least to define the version...)
> >
> > Vincent
>
> Windows 2003 Standard Edition (let me know if you want another edition):
> Majour Version: 5
> Minor Version: 2
> Build Number: 3790
> Platform ID: 2
> CSDVersion empty (NULLs)
> ServicePackMajor: 0
> ServicePackMinor: 0
> Reserved: 272, 3

Thanks Shachar, but there's still something I'm not sure about.

After ServicePackMinor, our winbase.h defines the following fields:
WORD wSuiteMask
BYTE wProductType
BYTE wReserved

I suppose your winbase.h only had two WORD wReserved(1,2)?
If that's the case, wSuiteMask maps to 272
(VER_SUITE_SINGLEUSERTS|VER_SUITE_TERMINAL), and wProductType to
VER_NT_SERVER. That would be our first version advertised as
VER_NT_SERVER. Is there a workstation version of 2K3, as earlier NT
versions were always defined as that in Wine?

Vincent

[Shachar Shemesh]

Vincent Béron wrote:
> Le mer 13/08/2003 à 01:40, Shachar Shemesh a écrit :
> > Windows 2003 Standard Edition (let me know if you want another edition):
> > Majour Version: 5
> > Minor Version: 2
> > Build Number: 3790
> > Platform ID: 2
> > CSDVersion empty (NULLs)
> > ServicePackMajor: 0
> > ServicePackMinor: 0
> > Reserved: 272, 3
>
> Thanks Shachar, but there's still something I'm not sure about.
>
> After ServicePackMinor, our winbase.h defines the following fields:
> WORD wSuiteMask
> BYTE wProductType
> BYTE wReserved
>
> I suppose your winbase.h only had two WORD wReserved(1,2)?
> If that's the case, wSuiteMask maps to 272
> (VER_SUITE_SINGLEUSERTS|VER_SUITE_TERMINAL), and wProductType to
> VER_NT_SERVER. That would be our first version advertised as
> VER_NT_SERVER. Is there a workstation version of 2K3, as earlier NT
> versions were always defined as that in Wine?
>
> Vincent

Windows 2003 comes in three flavours, apparently. Web edition, Standard 
Edition and Enterprise Edition. All three are considered "Windows 2003 
Server". There is no "Windows 2003 Pro", "Home", "Workstation" or 
whatever. In that respect, yes, it does make sense.

The headers I was using are the standard ones that come with Visual 
Studio 6 SP5. If the struct is supposed to have extra parameters, I have 
not seen them (I used the debugger's ability to spread a struct's 
content - I'm lazy that way). If there is some source you want to send 
me to run, please let me know.

I tested everything on Windows 2003 server standard edition. I can 
install the web or the enterprise editions, but I'm afraid the setup 
took over an hour for this one, and I actually need it for some testing. 
If it's really crucial to you, I'll try to install it on a virtual 
machine (will probably be faster than my PII 233 160MB machine that 
installed this version).

Shachar

[Vincent Béron]

Le mer 13/08/2003 à 11:31, Shachar Shemesh a écrit :
> Windows 2003 comes in three flavours, apparently. Web edition, Standard 
> Edition and Enterprise Edition. All three are considered "Windows 2003 
> Server". There is no "Windows 2003 Pro", "Home", "Workstation" or 
> whatever. In that respect, yes, it does make sense.
>
> The headers I was using are the standard ones that come with Visual 
> Studio 6 SP5. If the struct is supposed to have extra parameters, I have 
> not seen them (I used the debugger's ability to spread a struct's 
> content - I'm lazy that way). If there is some source you want to send 
> me to run, please let me know.

No, thanks for the rundown. The patch I sent to wine-patches is correct
then.
> I tested everything on Windows 2003 server standard edition. I can 
> install the web or the enterprise editions, but I'm afraid the setup 
> took over an hour for this one, and I actually need it for some testing. 
> If it's really crucial to you, I'll try to install it on a virtual 
> machine (will probably be faster than my PII 233 160MB machine that 
> installed this version).

No need to install the other editions for me. Although the question can
be asked: which edition do we want Wine to return?

Vincent