Re: [1/3] d3dx9: Partial implementation of D3DXAssembleShader function. [try 3]

[James Mckenzie]

> > Well, in 2010 I've only done little changes. The real development on
> > this was in 2009. What's the policy in these cases? I believe I can
> > put the 2010 safely.
>
> I have seen people adjust the years for simple fixes, although I don't know if there is a formal 
> policy. Since your patches are going in now I guess anything from "2009", "2009, 2010" to "2010" is
> warranted.
>
> Since most countries don't require a copyright notice any longer(although still recommend it) I guess
> there is no real legal significance to the year. In most places copyright expiration doesn't depend on
> the publication date but on the year of the death of the last surviving creator.
>
> IANAL, somebody who knows this better please correct me.

I thought that AJ only wanted a copyright notification if significant contributions were added.  As to the date the format 2009-2010 would be most suitable in this case.

James McKenzie