Re: [1/2] winex11: NV_texture_rectangle and NV_vertex_array_range do not have WGL extension names

[Roderick Colenbrander]

Both are 'fake' WGL extensions. I agree that no string should be displayed in 
either case and that we don't need a check for NV_texture_rectangle.

The loading of the NV vertex array range stuff depending on the presence of 
the GL extension of which it is part is fine. Yes, GL extensions are context 
dependend but relying on glXGetProcAddress is even more evil (as it doesn't 
have to return NULL). Upto now I haven't seen problems with this.

On Friday 10 August 2007 11:15, Chris Robinson wrote:
> This patch and the next are designed to remove the need for
> context-specific information taken from a temporary context. For this one,
> the aforementioned extensions don't have WGL extension names. Their
> respective specs and a recent nvidia card/driver's WGL extension output
> confirms this.