Re: d3d [2]: Optional callback infrastructure for implicit texture surface destruction.

[H. Verbeet]

On 03/12/06, Markus Amsler  wrote:
> dlls/wined3d/texture.c           |   53
> +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>    include/wine/wined3d_interface.h |    7 +++++
>    2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

I think the callback should be non-optional.

d3d [2]: Optional callback infrastructure for implicit texture surface destruction.

[Markus Amsler]

H. Verbeet wrote:
> I think the callback should be non-optional.

I think you're right. I wanted to avoid code duplication for default 
callbacks in ddraw, d3d8, d3d9, wined3d. But the non-optional way would 
avoid duplication in wined3d, and it's more elegant => non-optional wins 
with 1:2. I will rework them.