Am Donnerstag, den 22.05.2008, 10:37 +0200 schrieb Francois Gouget:
- ok(len == 39, "len: %d (expected 39)",len);
- ok(len == 39, "len: %d (expected 39)\n", len);
[and so on]
You are right. This was missing from my patch that got applied. I sent an updated version one hour later[1] (got through moderation 6 hours later or so), which does - Include the missing "\n" characters - Makes this function indented like the others in ole32/tests/compobj.c - Test another case that wine gets wrong (with todo_wine)
In direct sucession[2], I sent a patch which corrects the problem in wine and removes the todo_wine from the testcase again. I did it that way to seperate the two patches, still preventing the testsuite to show an additional failure.
Was something wrong with the way I handled the first not-that-good patch (apart from sending it with the missing new lines at all, of course)?
Regards, Michael Karcher
[1]: 1211272286.9165.17.camel@hermes2.karcher.local [2]: 1211268226.9165.13.camel@hermes2.karcher.local