Thomas Faber thfabba@gmx.de writes:
An alternative solution would be not to generate a vtable structure at all, and instead add a dummy member to the class directly. That would be in line with what the defined(__cplusplus) && !defined(CINTERFACE) case results in, but require a slightly larger change to widl.
I'm not sure it makes sense to even define a C structure at all, since there's nothing you can do with it.
On 2013-06-25 21:11, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Thomas Faber thfabba@gmx.de writes:
An alternative solution would be not to generate a vtable structure at all, and instead add a dummy member to the class directly. That would be in line with what the defined(__cplusplus) && !defined(CINTERFACE) case results in, but require a slightly larger change to widl.
I'm not sure it makes sense to even define a C structure at all, since there's nothing you can do with it.
Hmm. The only thing I could think of would be someone making a pointer to such an object, to later cast to a derived class. Since there's a typedef generated earlier in the file, the struct should already be known (as an incomplete type), so that scenario would work even without the struct definition.
So... I agree. I'll send an updated patch that won't generate the structure at all.
-
Alexandre Julliard -
Thomas Faber