Gerald Pfeifer gerald@pfeifer.com writes:
I wonder, how our Type42 support ever could have worked given the following:
type42.c: In function `T42_download_header': type42.c:269: warning: int format, DWORD arg (arg 3) type42.c:269: warning: int format, DWORD arg (arg 4) type42.c: In function `T42_download_glyph': type42.c:364: warning: int format, DWORD arg (arg 4) type42.c:364: warning: int format, DWORD arg (arg 6)
The patch below avoid this warnings, and in fact probably is even needed to make this work correctly.
The patch is of course OK, but it makes no difference to the functionality, int and DWORD are the same size. It's only a cosmetic issue.
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
type42.c: In function `T42_download_header': type42.c:269: warning: int format, DWORD arg (arg 3) type42.c:269: warning: int format, DWORD arg (arg 4)
The patch is of course OK, but it makes no difference to the functionality, int and DWORD are the same size. It's only a cosmetic issue.
Gosh, I really had my head with some other machines (with larger int); you are right, of course!
Gerald