On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 09:58:36PM +0100, André Hentschel wrote:
Signed-off-by: André Hentschel nerv@dawncrow.de
dlls/comctl32/comctl32.spec | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/comctl32/comctl32.spec b/dlls/comctl32/comctl32.spec index c3e9167..dbfa123 100644 --- a/dlls/comctl32/comctl32.spec +++ b/dlls/comctl32/comctl32.spec @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ 382 stdcall -noname SmoothScrollWindow(ptr) 383 stub -noname DoReaderMode 384 stdcall -noname SetPathWordBreakProc(ptr long) -385 stdcall -ordinal DPA_EnumCallback(long long ptr) +385 stdcall -ordinal DPA_EnumCallback(long ptr ptr)
Should be: 385 stdcall -ordinal DPA_EnumCallback(ptr ptr ptr)
Huw.
Am 30.01.2017 um 11:32 schrieb Huw Davies:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 09:58:36PM +0100, André Hentschel wrote:
Signed-off-by: André Hentschel nerv@dawncrow.de
dlls/comctl32/comctl32.spec | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/dlls/comctl32/comctl32.spec b/dlls/comctl32/comctl32.spec index c3e9167..dbfa123 100644 --- a/dlls/comctl32/comctl32.spec +++ b/dlls/comctl32/comctl32.spec @@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ 382 stdcall -noname SmoothScrollWindow(ptr) 383 stub -noname DoReaderMode 384 stdcall -noname SetPathWordBreakProc(ptr long) -385 stdcall -ordinal DPA_EnumCallback(long long ptr) +385 stdcall -ordinal DPA_EnumCallback(long ptr ptr)
Should be: 385 stdcall -ordinal DPA_EnumCallback(ptr ptr ptr)
Huw.
True, thx! The reason is that I'm currently ignoring handles as we don't have a clear rule for them, and as the first parameter type begins with an H, my script thought it is a handle and ignored it...
On 01/30/2017 11:07 PM, André Hentschel wrote:
True, thx! The reason is that I'm currently ignoring handles as we don't have a clear rule for them, and as the first parameter type begins with an H, my script thought it is a handle and ignored it...
Most handles are pointer types. But of course there are exceptions.
bye michael
Michael Stefaniuc mstefani@redhat.com writes:
On 01/30/2017 11:07 PM, André Hentschel wrote:
True, thx! The reason is that I'm currently ignoring handles as we don't have a clear rule for them, and as the first parameter type begins with an H, my script thought it is a handle and ignored it...
Most handles are pointer types. But of course there are exceptions.
Even when the actual type is a pointer, most handles are conceptually ints, they don't point to anything. In any case, it doesn't matter which type we use for handles, and we definitely don't want to start "fixing" them.
Maybe we should just get rid of the ptr type once and for all...